Search found 7 matches
- Sun Sep 01, 2013 6:15 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Multiple cameras
- Replies: 41
- Views: 38262
i would be interested in that
i would be interested in that if it's not too much of a bother
- Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:18 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Multiple cameras
- Replies: 41
- Views: 38262
I am not concerned with
I am not concerned with cables... just function. I think this is a good compromise and one that breeze has to do too.
- Sat Aug 31, 2013 6:40 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Multiple cameras
- Replies: 41
- Views: 38262
I'm not opposed to using a
I'm not opposed to using a microcontroller optocontrollers.
So, if i understand correctly. You would still incorporate the usb interface for the live view and photo download?
So, if i understand correctly. You would still incorporate the usb interface for the live view and photo download?
- Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:24 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Multiple cameras
- Replies: 41
- Views: 38262
add
Sorry, I would like to add that eventually I would like to go up to at least 75
- Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:24 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Multiple cameras
- Replies: 41
- Views: 38262
add
Sorry, I would like to add that eventually I would like to go up to at least 75
- Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:22 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Multiple cameras
- Replies: 41
- Views: 38262
multiple
<t>Ultimately many.. as many as I can gang.<br/> The issue we must remember is even breeze has limitations. With breeze you can only tether up to16 to one pc. It also cannot fire the shutters simultaneously with the pc release. There is a delay there as well. What breeze suggest is to fire them with...
- Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:21 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Multiple cameras
- Replies: 41
- Views: 38262
interested
I would most certyainly be interested in that!